Have your say

Terminal Development Plan for Nanaimo and Gabriola

The Ferry Advisory Committee invites comments and suggestions from Gabriola residents and businesses on the key issues that should be considered in the forthcoming Terminal Development Plan for the Nanaimo Harbour and Gabriola Island ferry terminals.

Concerns and opportunities identified recently by the FAC can be seen in a separate document here.

Comments and suggestions should be concise and constructive please. All comments will be forwarded to BC Ferries for consideration ahead of a planned public meeting in May/June 2018. We reserve the right to edit lengthy responses and remove any abusive material before publication.

Advertisements

13 thoughts on “Have your say

  1. Why can’t pedestrians board/disembark at the same time as vehicle traffic? This is done at other terminals, e.g. Quadra. It would require a separate walkway; surely not a huge expense at each end of the route.

    A time saving of even, say, three minutes per sailing (it’s likely much more) would greatly increase ferry efficiency. We should not have to wait until 2021 for such an obvious improvement.

    We also need some enforcement along the line-up, to stop people leaving large unnecessary gaps — sometimes 100′ – and to stop illegal u-turns. BC Ferries advises parking 2′ from the car in front; enforce it, please.

    • I’ve often thought the same thing. The current process of “pedestrians off, vehicles off, pedestrians on, vehicles on, pedestrians on” is very inefficient. But if there is not going to be any increase in turnaround time or increase in number of sailings as a result of changing the process then it probably really doesn’t matter.

      • If nothing else, it might reduce the possibility of running late during peak periods. I watched today; a cluster left, then two more appeared, just as most of the pedestrians were on board (Nanaimo); then another one came out while the two were almost up the ramp. At the Gabriola off-load, the same slackers were last off.

        With 16 sailings a day, even two minutes delay on each sailing adds up. Add in a few vehicle delays for full loads and the ferry is running 25 minutes late.

  2. Most of my business in Nanaimo is conducted within walking distance of the ferry terminal. But I need to take my car because I cannot climb the hill to the parking lot behind the pub. We need more passenger parking on lower level.

  3. Comments received via Facebook:

    Sherrie Spracklin : I hope we’re not going to have a huge terminal put here, we need another ferry, one coming and one leaving during the busy season, instead of construction and a bigger terminal. Don’t want that, and we don’t need that.

    Taylor Haigh : A very clear crosswalk with pedestrian control and a safe sidewalk is a good start. A less congested drop off/pick up for vehicles would also be great.

    Sarah Schwartz : I agree totally, I had the same thought. Especially about the sidewalk.

    Jilann Campbell : Exactly, I’m onboard with this!

    Louise Pearson : I do not live on Gabriola but do take the Ferry over 3 days a week, it is a gong show in the parking lot. I generally don’t walk up the hill and use the Gertie. which doesn’t always come. The last snow fall we saw probably an 11 yr old boy nearly hit by a B Train truck. As the roads weren’t plowed there was one pathway to walk and drive up the hill. Then we are told by RCMP “Get off the road these trucks can’t stop”, so where do you go. It is getting to the point to start video taping these drivers that are in such a hurry, no time management skills for getting up the hill. I hope there won’t be another fatality before some of this gets solved.

  4. How about a floating terminal? You only need something the size of the Quinsam to hold a full sailing’s worth of vehicles. It would remove most of the traffic from Taylor Bay Road while letting a new or larger ferry berth farther off shore . One of the old decommissioned ferries would be fantastic.

  5. In the interest of a thorough-going assessment of our Gab. ferry challenges please note the following.

    As well as Taylor Bay Road traffic, Easthom Road is a significant safety issue as well.

    Required travel lane widths for safe vehicular travel – Ministry policy: 7.2 meters or 23.5 feet. Yet vehicles always park illegally into road lanes.

    Easthom Road… an accident waiting to happen

    • vehicles parked on the travel right-of-way often as much as half of the lane.
    • vehicles passing opposite to each other have to stop or tentatively creep by to make their way.
    • car doors frequently opening obstructing up to 80% of the designated lane width.
    • during darkness parked cars are near unseeable requiring sudden evasive action to avoid rear end collision.
    • pedestrians are forced time and time again to walk in the lanes of oncoming traffic, this the only place available for making their way.
    • people, including children, suddenly step right out from between parked cars into oncoming traffic without looking.
    • clearly, increasing bank instability from parked cars

    There are parking spaces all the time in the parking lots adjacent to Skol.

    Perhaps no parking signs are required and enforced.

    The Easthom Road illegal ferry parking is a safety issue which needs addressing.

    C. Worthing

  6. saturday april 07/2018 the 3:45 ferry was heavy overloaded because the 2:25 ferry did not run to save money for the bc ferries. It is about time that the bc ferries put service ahead of profit. The ferry is a road to vancouver island for gabs . From 1980 to 2003 there were 3 more runs daily and 4 more daily on the weekend and of course the population has increased and the service has decreased.

  7. Hi Kevin. Yes, I was on that ferry too, and it was busy in the passenger lounge as well. The FAC has been pushing BC Ferries to reinstate those early afternoon weekend ferries for several years now, and we have had some success, first in getting the summer ones back and now in shoulder season and long-weekend runs back. We will continue to apply pressure to have all of the early-afternoon runs back into the schedule.

    Steve for the FAC

  8. Sunday April 15th:
    We were traveling from Gabriola to Nanaimo (a frequent occurrence) and the overhead safety announcement was excessively loud, long and at an inappropriate time of the voyage. It was 1 minutes into the voyage and this was not an opportune time because passenger focus was and is distracted at this time period. We would respectfully suggest either the messages are right when all the cars have boarded (and passengers are waiting for the vessel to depart) or 5 minutes out to sea after people are settled and able to listen and absorb the announcements. Regardless of the time of the announcements the primary concern is the excessive volume of the announcements.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s